The problem with “detainees” vice prisoners
- December 31st, 2009
- Write comment
In my last blog i alluded to the problem with political correctness and the issues it is causing in the prosecution of the war on Terror. Recently it has become apparent that the uncertainty and lack of clarity on the issue clouds the outcome.
Said Ali al-Shihri is a saudi who was captured in the wake of 9/11 in Afghanistan. He was interred in Guantanamo and was found to have close terrorist ties to Al Qaeda. Despite this, he was released on the promise to go back to the kingdom of Saud and work in his families furniture shop.
As with so many of those we have released in the name of political correctness, he has returned to the battlefield. Most recently in a propaganda film supporting Al Qaeda and assisting with their theological branching into Yemen.
He has not been found directly responsible for the actions of Abdulmutallab, however his influence has assisted in the radicalizing of him. Additional his assistance in the standing up Al Qaeda in Yemen which trained and financed the botched operation of the “Underpants Bomber”.
Couple his release which indirectly lead to the near catastrophe on Christmas with the fact that the liberals wish to free and impart rights to our enemies that they don’t deserve, and you end up having people spending several years in prison, awaiting a trial. In Al Shihri’s case, he is quoted as “By God, our imprisonment has only increased our persistence and adherence to our principles,”. Therefore keeping them in prison longer only foments this process.
Is it not a better servant of Justice to declare these leaderless, uniformless, armyless individuals as prisoners of war, and trying them by Court Martial; than to keep them in limbo for six or seven years, growing their hate and disdain of this “Great Satan”?
Hence why being a prisoner, is much better than a “detainee”. It imparts justice quicker, saves tax payer money, and makes these people less political pawns than they need to be.
